![]() It sounds worse than it is in actual practice - you do eventually get the hang of things and learn to differentiate the secondary domains that host the site's images (necessary) from the advertisers that want to put a banner ad across the page (unnecessary and possibly dangerous). Of course, sometimes this third-party content is also necessary, so it does occasionally become a guessing game of allowing the fewest domains, while still keeping the site usable. The advantage of NoScript is that when you whitelist the main site, you are not also whitelisting the advertisers and other third-party domains on the page. If you go to a new site that doesn't work, you can size up the place and then decide if you trust it enough to allow the scripting to run - so simply going to a new site is not as dangerous as it would be if JavaScript is globally allowed for any sites you visit. ![]() Most sites now use JavaScript to some extent. Any increased security measures you adopt are going to require a bit of patience and dedication at first, but eventually most of the sites you use regularly will be permanently whitelisted and you will only occasionally need to allow new sites. Firefox with the NoScript extension is probably the most user-friendly and configurable arrangement, but any method you use is going to demand some sacrifice of convenience. Yeah, IE is not the best option for JavaScript-conscious users. It also gives me the piece of mind that my system is no longer compromised, nothing was left behind, and no operating system files were damaged in the process of removing the infection.īut thats just my opinion, and ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.īut doesn't restricting java script make it hard to look at legit websites? Would one have to keep adding websites to trusted zone? Not only am I protecting myself against infections, I am also protecting my system and data from more common problems like hard drive and hardware problems or stupid mistakes I may make. I can rewrite the MBR, zero out the drive, and restore my system in a little over an hour. I can restore my system to a "known good" state in less than a half hour.įor something like a rootkit that may be able to survive a "quick format" (That is not actually a format at all). However for me, I always have considered full system images as my first line of defense and the AV as second. ![]() For the majority of threats it works great, it blocks or cures an infection and you can continue to use your system with no downtime and every system needs to have one. I have never considered an Anti-Virus to be a first line of defense since no AV will ever be able to protect you from 100% of threats.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |